“We are at the starting line” of open banking payments, says Stripe-backed TrueLayer CEO

Explore open banking payments in 2026 with TrueLayer, Stripe, Amazon, and eBay insights, discover pay by bank trends, VRPs, adoption drivers, and growth.

MEAN CEO - “We are at the starting line” of open banking payments, says Stripe-backed TrueLayer CEO | “We are at the starting line” of open banking payments

TL;DR: Open banking payments are becoming a real growth and margin lever for founders

Table of Contents

Pay by bank is still early, which gives you time to prepare before customer habits and merchant behavior shift at scale. The article argues that open banking payments are moving from fintech niche to commercial tool, especially as players like TrueLayer, Stripe, Amazon, and eBay help normalize direct bank payments across Europe.

Why this matters to you: pay by bank can cut card fees, improve payment control, speed up settlement in some cases, and reduce reliance on card networks. If your startup depends on checkout conversion, recurring billing, or high-ticket transactions, this affects your margins now.

Where the upside is strongest: marketplaces, ecommerce, food delivery, crypto, travel, ticketing, and subscription businesses stand to gain the most because payment friction directly hits revenue, trust, and repeat purchases. The open banking payments interview signals that merchant rollout, not the tech itself, is the real race.

What smart founders should do: audit your payment mix, spot high-fee transactions, test customer rewards for pay by bank, and watch recurring bank payment models like VRP. The eBay investment in TrueLayer is a strong market signal that large commerce players expect this shift to matter.

If cards are still your only serious checkout assumption, now is a good time to rethink your payment setup.


Check out other fresh news that you might like:

TaxDown secures €4M from BBVA Spark to enhance its AI solution


“We are at the starting line” of open banking payments, says Stripe-backed TrueLayer CEO
Open banking is still at the starting line, but this fintech crew already looks like they’re arguing over who gets to break the payment internet first. Unsplash

Europe’s payment stack is being rebuilt in public, and most founders still treat it like a side note. That is the part I find fascinating. In March 2026, TrueLayer CEO Francesco Simoneschi told Tech.eu in this open banking payments interview that pay by bank is still “at the starting line.” I agree with the direction of that claim, and I think many entrepreneurs still underestimate what it means. When a Stripe-backed infrastructure company, with backing also linked to Tiger Global and fresh strategic money from eBay, says the market is still early, founders should pay attention.

I have spent years building products in regulated and infrastructure-heavy spaces, from IPtech and blockchain to startup tooling and game-based founder education. My bias is simple: when the rails change, business models change right after. Payments are not a boring back-office layer. Payments shape margin, trust, conversion, retries, fraud exposure, data access, and customer habit. If direct bank payments move from niche to normal, a lot of startups will discover that they designed their checkout, billing, and retention logic for an old world.

Here is why this matters now. Open banking payments are no longer a policy experiment. They are becoming a real commercial weapon for marketplaces, ecommerce, digital services, food delivery, crypto platforms, and subscription businesses that want lower card costs and better control over the payment flow. The big question for founders is not whether open banking exists. The real question is whether your company is preparing for the moment when customers start expecting to pay straight from their bank account.


Why does TrueLayer’s “starting line” comment matter to founders in 2026?

The short answer is market timing. The longer answer is more useful. When a category reaches the “starting line,” it usually means the infrastructure is maturing faster than public perception. Founders who wait for mass adoption headlines often arrive late, when margins are already compressed and larger players have trained users first.

According to the Tech.eu report on TrueLayer and pay by bank, Simoneschi pointed to large retailer uptake as still very early. That is a very specific signal. It suggests the bottleneck is not whether the tech works. The bottleneck is commercial rollout, consumer habit formation, and merchant willingness to redesign checkout around bank payments rather than just layering them in as an afterthought.

That distinction matters a lot. I see many founders confuse infrastructure readiness with market readiness. They are different things. The API can work perfectly, and the market can still be psychologically early. In startup terms, this is the awkward phase where the winners quietly sign distribution deals, fix UX friction, and lock in merchant relationships before the broader market notices.

For me, this is the real founder takeaway: the infrastructure war is shifting from “can this be built?” to “who gets merchant habit and customer trust first?”

What is pay by bank, and why is it different from card payments?

Let’s define the term clearly. Pay by bank means a customer pays a merchant directly from their bank account, usually using open banking rails. Open banking is a regulated framework that lets licensed third parties connect to bank accounts, with customer permission, to initiate payments or access financial data. In this article, we are talking about the payment side, not budgeting apps or account aggregation.

Card payments move through card schemes such as Visa and Mastercard, plus issuers, acquirers, processors, and gateways. Pay by bank skips much of that chain. That can mean lower fees, real-time confirmation in many cases, and fewer moving parts between buyer and seller.

  • Card payment: customer enters card details, payment is routed through card networks and payment processors.
  • Pay by bank: customer authorizes a bank transfer from their own banking app or bank-authenticated flow.
  • Open banking payment initiation: the regulated technical method that triggers that direct account-to-account payment.

From a founder point of view, the advantages are practical, not ideological:

  • Lower payment costs on many transaction types
  • Less dependence on card rails
  • Potentially higher trust for bank-authenticated flows
  • Faster settlement in some use cases
  • Useful fit for high-value purchases, marketplaces, deposits, wallet top-ups, and recurring bank-based payments

The catch is also practical. User behavior is sticky. Cards are familiar. Consumers know how to tap, save, retry, and dispute card payments. So open banking payments do not win by existing. They win by becoming easier at the exact moment of checkout, and by giving merchants a reason to steer customers there.

Where is the real business opportunity in open banking payments?

I see the biggest opportunity in sectors where payment cost, frequency, or trust really matter. This is where pay by bank can move from “alternative method” to “profit lever.” When I build or advise products, I look for infrastructure shifts that change unit economics. Open banking payments fit that pattern.

Which sectors stand to gain the most?

  • Marketplaces: lower transaction costs, better payout logic, and cleaner movement of funds matter a lot.
  • Ecommerce for high-ticket goods: fee savings become visible fast when basket size rises.
  • Food delivery and repeat commerce: frequent user-merchant interaction can train new payment habits faster.
  • Crypto and trading platforms: direct account funding is already a strong use case, and TrueLayer has long been known in that segment.
  • Travel and ticketing: large payments, refund complexity, and checkout conversion create room for better bank-based flows.
  • Subscriptions and recurring billing: this is where Variable Recurring Payments, or VRPs, may become a big unlock.

Notice the pattern. The best categories are not just “online businesses.” They are businesses where payment friction directly damages growth, margin, or trust. That is why I think founders should stop treating payments like a plugin choice and start treating them like product strategy.

TrueLayer’s own public messaging supports this broader push. In its UK partnership announcement with Stripe, the company stated that it had reached 1 million monthly VRP transactions last year and described itself as the first UK open banking provider to deliver commercial VRP through an API, according to the TrueLayer and Stripe UK Pay by Bank announcement. That is not mass-market saturation, but it is very far from zero.

Why are Amazon, eBay, Stripe, and major merchants so important here?

Because infrastructure categories do not become mainstream through fintech press alone. They become mainstream when large distribution players normalize the behavior. I learned this repeatedly in deeptech and founder tooling. Users rarely adopt a new system because it is philosophically better. They adopt it because a familiar platform makes it feel normal, safe, and worth the switch.

Amazon matters because checkout behavior can be trained at giant scale. eBay matters because strategic capital from a major commerce company is a stronger market signal than a generic VC round. Stripe matters because it sits at the center of internet commerce for thousands of businesses that do not want to build payment infrastructure from scratch.

When these companies move, they do three things at once:

  • They reduce perceived risk for merchants
  • They normalize the customer flow
  • They compress the time it takes for a new payment behavior to feel standard

From my point of view as a founder, the scary part is not that pay by bank might fail. The scary part is that it might work faster than many startups are architected for. If your revenue depends on card-first assumptions, you may be one product cycle behind before you notice.

What does the European angle tell us about the future of payment rails?

This is where I get more opinionated. Europe has spent years talking about digital sovereignty, dependence on foreign platforms, and the need for stronger local infrastructure. Payments are one of the clearest places where that debate becomes commercial reality. If more commerce moves to account-to-account payments, Europe gets a stronger case for payment rails that are not fully shaped by global card schemes.

Simoneschi reportedly linked open banking to the idea of sovereign payment infrastructure. I think founders should take that seriously. Not because patriotism pays invoices, but because infrastructure ownership shapes margins, bargaining power, and rule-setting. If the checkout layer changes, the power map changes with it.

Stripe and TrueLayer are already expanding this model across Europe. According to the France and Germany launch announcement from TrueLayer, Pay by Bank within the European Union is expected to reach 30 billion payments in 2028. Even if one treats vendor forecasts with caution, the direction is clear. France and Germany are not test labs. They are large economies where payment habit shifts carry weight.

And the Nordic push matters too. Through the Finland rollout with Kustom Checkout, TrueLayer says it is live across 22 countries and trusted by more than 20 million users. Kustom itself says it serves over 24,000 merchants with sales in more than 170 countries. That tells me this is not a single-market story anymore. It is a regional rail-building story.

What should founders actually do if they want to prepare for pay by bank?

Here is the practical part. Founders do not need to become payment policy nerds. They do need to redesign a few assumptions. I always tell startup teams the same thing: infrastructure shifts punish lazy product thinking. If you want to benefit from open banking payments, you have to build around customer behavior, incentives, and operations, not just add another button to checkout.

A six-step founder checklist for 2026

  1. Audit your payment mix. Check what share of revenue depends on cards, wallet payments, bank transfers, and recurring billing. If you do not know, start there.
  2. Find your highest-fee transaction group. High-ticket purchases, repeat payments, and payout-heavy models often show the fastest upside.
  3. Map where customer trust breaks. Look at failed checkouts, abandoned carts, retry rates, and support tickets tied to payments.
  4. Test customer steering. Offer a discount, faster confirmation, loyalty benefit, or preferred refund handling for pay by bank.
  5. Prepare recurring bank-based logic. If your model depends on repeat charges, study commercial VRP and adjacent bank-based recurring models.
  6. Choose markets carefully. Open banking maturity differs by country, bank UX, and merchant familiarity. Roll out where the rails and customer habits are stronger.

As someone who builds systems for non-experts, I care a lot about hidden complexity. Founders should not need a legal department to understand whether this is relevant. The simple test is this: if payment fees, failed transactions, or reconciliation pain show up in your monthly metrics, open banking deserves board-level attention.

How can merchants make customers actually choose pay by bank?

This is where many teams get it wrong. They think adding a new payment option creates adoption. It does not. User behavior changes when the new option is easier, cheaper, faster, or more rewarding in a visible way. Simoneschi reportedly mentioned loyalty as a big future lever, and I think that is exactly right.

Large retailers already understand rewards psychology. In my work with gamepreneurship, I have a blunt rule: gamification without real stakes is useless. The same applies here. A customer will not switch payment behavior because you wrote “new” next to a bank button. They might switch if that choice gives them something concrete.

  • Instant discount: even a small price advantage can train repeat behavior.
  • Faster refunds: customers care a lot about getting money back cleanly.
  • Loyalty point multiplier: this is the commerce version of habit design.
  • Preferred checkout path: fewer fields, fewer redirects, less friction.
  • Trust framing: clear bank-authenticated language can reassure users.

The merchant question is not “Can we offer pay by bank?” The sharper question is “Why would the customer pick it the second time?” That second payment is where habit begins.

What are the biggest mistakes startups make with open banking payments?

Let’s break it down. I see the same category errors again and again when startups deal with foundational systems.

  • Mistake 1: treating payments as a finance team issue only. Payments affect product, growth, support, legal, and retention.
  • Mistake 2: copying enterprise checkout patterns blindly. Your customers, ticket sizes, and trust signals may be completely different.
  • Mistake 3: ignoring country-by-country variation. Bank UX, local trust, and merchant readiness differ across Europe.
  • Mistake 4: not connecting payment method to rewards. If there is no visible benefit, habit change is slow.
  • Mistake 5: forgetting recurring use cases. Many teams focus on one-off checkout and miss bank-based repeat payments.
  • Mistake 6: waiting for mass adoption headlines. By then, the distribution advantage may belong to someone else.

I would add one more. Founders often ask whether a new infrastructure trend will “replace” the old one. That is the wrong framing. Card payments will not vanish because bank payments grow. The smarter approach is portfolio logic. Use the right rail for the right customer, market, transaction type, and margin profile.

How do Variable Recurring Payments fit into this story?

Variable Recurring Payments, or VRPs, are recurring bank payments where the amount can vary within agreed limits. This matters because many digital businesses do not bill customers in a fixed, perfectly predictable way. Think usage-based services, wallet top-ups, flexible subscriptions, and other repeat payment flows that are clumsy under older bank debit models.

VRP is one of the most commercially interesting parts of open banking because it attacks a stubborn problem. Founders want the lower-cost logic of bank payments, but they also need the repeatability and convenience users expect from cards. If VRP becomes easier to deploy and more trusted by consumers, that could push open banking from checkout novelty into billing infrastructure.

This is why I think founders in SaaS, fintech, creator platforms, marketplaces, and digital services should track VRP closely. TrueLayer’s public claim that it powered 1 million monthly VRP transactions is an early sign that this is moving beyond theory. Not mature everywhere, not universal, but real.

What does TrueLayer’s own recent trajectory reveal?

It reveals a company that has gone through the painful middle chapter many infrastructure startups hit. There was reported restructuring in 2024, including layoffs of around a quarter of staff, and then fresh strategic backing from eBay in 2026. To me, that combination says focus. Not comfort, not hype, but focus.

I respect that pattern more than endless vanity growth. As a founder, I have little patience for polished narratives that hide operational reality. Infrastructure companies often need to cut hard, narrow their thesis, and pick the markets where distribution is strongest. If TrueLayer is now pairing Stripe distribution, retail relationships, and broader European rollout, that suggests a more disciplined phase of category building.

There is also a strategic independence angle. The Tech.eu coverage indicated that Simoneschi likes building TrueLayer as an independent company rather than positioning it as a quick acquisition target. I think that matters because categories like open banking payments may create far more value at the rail level than at the feature level. If you believe the market is just starting, selling too early can mean handing the upside to somebody else.

Which sources matter most if you want to track this market properly?

If you are serious about understanding the category, do not rely on one article. Build a small source set that covers reporting, company announcements, and market expansion.

Founders who do this well read across source types. Journalism gives market context. Company releases give numbers and product intent. Partner announcements reveal distribution logic. Put them together and the category becomes easier to read.

So, are we really at the starting line?

Yes, but not in the naive sense. We are not at the starting line of the technology itself. We are at the starting line of merchant-scale behavioral change. That is the more valuable phase anyway. The code matters, but habit is where markets tip.

My founder view is simple. Open banking payments have moved from policy topic to commercial design problem. The companies that win will not be the ones with the prettiest fintech pitch. They will be the ones that connect bank payments to real incentives, cleaner UX, recurring billing logic, and stronger economics. That applies to payment providers, merchants, marketplaces, and software startups that sit one layer above the rail.

If you are a startup founder, freelancer, or business owner, do not file this under “fintech news.” File it under margin, conversion, and strategic control. That is where it belongs. And if you are still building your company like cards are the only serious digital payment habit worth designing for, 2026 is a very good year to rethink that assumption.

I build companies on a simple belief: infrastructure should be invisible to the user and painfully visible to the founder. Payments fit that rule perfectly. The rails are changing. The smartest founders will treat that as a product brief, not a headline.


FAQ on Open Banking Payments and Pay by Bank in Europe

Why should founders care about pay by bank in 2026?

Pay by bank is shifting from fintech niche to serious checkout strategy. It can reduce fees, improve payment control, and reshape retention logic for marketplaces, ecommerce, and subscriptions. Founders should review payment dependencies early. Explore the European Startup Playbook for scaling in Europe and read TrueLayer CEO’s open banking interview.

What is pay by bank and how is it different from card payments?

Pay by bank lets customers authorize payments directly from their bank accounts instead of routing through card schemes. That can mean lower costs, faster confirmation, and fewer intermediaries. It works best when checkout UX is simple and trusted. See startup growth strategy in Europe and see Stripe and TrueLayer’s UK pay by bank partnership.

Which startup sectors benefit most from open banking payments?

The strongest pay by bank use cases are marketplaces, high-ticket ecommerce, food delivery, crypto platforms, travel, and recurring billing businesses. These sectors feel payment fees, trust friction, and reconciliation pain more sharply than others. Use the European Startup Playbook to assess expansion strategy and review Finland rollout details with Kustom Checkout.

Why do Stripe, Amazon, and eBay matter so much for open banking adoption?

Large platforms accelerate trust and user habit formation. Stripe gives distribution, Amazon signals checkout-scale viability, and eBay’s strategic investment suggests real commerce confidence in bank-based payments. That combination reduces perceived merchant risk. Discover startup scaling frameworks for Europe and read about eBay’s strategic investment in TrueLayer.

Is Europe becoming a serious home for sovereign payment infrastructure?

Yes. Open banking and account-to-account rails support Europe’s push for more locally shaped payment infrastructure, less dependent on global card schemes. For founders, that can affect pricing power, product design, and market access across countries. Understand European market positioning for startups and read Tech.eu on the “starting line” of pay by bank.

What should a startup do first before adding pay by bank?

Start with a payment audit. Check card dependence, failed checkout rates, refund friction, and high-fee transaction groups. Then test pay by bank in one market or one use case before broad rollout. Apply practical scaling tactics from the European Startup Playbook and see France and Germany pay by bank expansion.

How can merchants convince customers to choose pay by bank?

Customers switch when there is a visible benefit: lower price, faster refund, better rewards, or simpler checkout. Merchants should actively steer behavior instead of passively adding another payment button. Incentives matter more than feature labels. Find Europe-focused startup execution advice and listen to the Tech.eu pay by bank podcast episode.

What are the biggest startup mistakes with open banking payments?

Common mistakes include treating payments as only a finance issue, ignoring country variation, skipping rewards design, and waiting for mass adoption headlines. Smart founders treat payment rails as part of product, growth, support, and retention. Get strategic startup planning guidance for Europe and read about TrueLayer and Stripe in Finland.

How do Variable Recurring Payments fit into startup billing models?

Variable Recurring Payments help businesses charge from bank accounts within agreed limits, making them useful for flexible subscriptions, wallet top-ups, and usage-based services. They may become a major bank-based alternative to card-on-file billing. Use the European Startup Playbook to map infrastructure shifts and review TrueLayer’s UK partner announcement mentioning VRP scale.

What does TrueLayer’s recent trajectory reveal about the market?

TrueLayer’s layoffs in 2024, strategic eBay backing in 2026, and continued Stripe-led expansion suggest the category is moving from hype to disciplined execution. That usually signals a market maturing commercially, not disappearing. See how to navigate European startup transitions and read Stripe’s broader fintech positioning.


MEAN CEO - “We are at the starting line” of open banking payments, says Stripe-backed TrueLayer CEO | “We are at the starting line” of open banking payments

Violetta Bonenkamp, also known as Mean CEO, is a female entrepreneur and an experienced startup founder, bootstrapping her startups. She has an impressive educational background including an MBA and four other higher education degrees. She has over 20 years of work experience across multiple countries, including 10 years as a solopreneur and serial entrepreneur. Throughout her startup experience she has applied for multiple startup grants at the EU level, in the Netherlands and Malta, and her startups received quite a few of those. She’s been living, studying and working in many countries around the globe and her extensive multicultural experience has influenced her immensely. Constantly learning new things, like AI, SEO, zero code, code, etc. and scaling her businesses through smart systems.